Macy's going to close Valley View Center store

Following a 34-year run, a Dallas Macy's store is among nine Macy's closing nationwide in light of slow sales, the company announced Friday.
The Macy's Valley View Center location, which employs 132, will go into sales-clearance mode on Jan. 13, and once it sells out of merchandise, its doors will close, said Macy's spokesman Ed Smith.
Macy’s Inc., the owner of its namesake chain and Bloomingdale’s, said Friday that it would close stores deemed to have inadequate sales and eliminate 899 jobs.
Macy’s will shut locations in Akron, Canton and North Randall, Ohio; Lake Charles, La.; Riverdale, Utah; Indianapolis; Oklahoma City; Houston; and Dallas. Final clearance sales will begin in the next few weeks, the retailer said.
The company will operate 815 Macy’s after shutting the stores, all of them locations the chain acquired when it bought May Department Stores in 2005, a spokesman, Jim Sluzewski, said. The retailer’s sales growth has been hurt by the former May stores, which were converted to the Macy’s name last year, analysts said.
“They are certainly muddling through, but not muddling through very well,” Patricia Edwards, a portfolio manager at Wentworth, Hauser & Violich in Seattle, said of the merger. “It’s a big bite to chew off, and these customers are used to different things.”
Former May shoppers want coupons and national brands, Ms. Edwards said, while Macy’s clients are accustomed to that chain’s own labels. She holds shares of retailers including Target.
Shares of Macy’s rose 44 cents, or 1.8 percent, to $25.48, on the New York Stock Exchange.
In a statement, Macy’s chief executive, Terry J. Lundgren, said: “While the decision to close stores is difficult, it is necessary that we do so selectively in locations with declining sales and where we have been unable to identify sufficient growth opportunities.”
The company, based in Cincinnati, opened 10 new stores and one furniture gallery in 2007. In 2008, it expects to open five stores, and has six to eight new locations planned for 2009.
Macy’s $11 billion acquisition of May made it the second-largest department store company after Sears Holdings. Macy’s converted more than 400 May locations, including Marshall Field’s and Hecht’s, to the Macy’s name, doubling the size of the chain, in September 2006. It operates 40 Bloomingdale’s stores.

Weekend Surge May Not Rescue Retailers' Holiday Slump

American consumers, uneasy about the economy and unimpressed by the merchandise in stores, delivered the bleak holiday shopping season retailers had expected, if not feared, according to one early but influential projection.
Spending between Thanksgiving and Christmas rose just 3.6 percent over last year, the weakest performance in at least four years, according to MasterCard Advisors, a division of the credit card company. By comparison, sales grew 6.6 percent in 2006, and 8 percent in 2005.
“There was not a recipe for a pick up in sales growth,” said Michael McNamara, vice president of research and analysis at MasterCard Advisors, citing higher gas prices, a slowing housing market and a tight credit market.
Strong demand at the start of the season for a handful of must-have electronics, like digital frames and portable GPS navigation systems trailed off in December. And robust sales of luxury products could not make up for sluggish sales of jewelry and women’s clothing.
What did eventually sell was generally marked down — once, if not twice — which could hurt retailers’ profits in the final three months of year. “Stores are buying those sales at a cost,” said Sherif Mityas, a partner at the consulting firm A.T. Kearney, who specializes in retailing.
A surge in spending during the weekend before Christmas may not have been enough to rescue Target Corp., Sears Holdings Corp. and Macy's Inc. from the slowest holiday spending season in five years.
MasterCard Inc.'s consulting unit said today that sales from Nov. 23 to Dec. 24 gained 3.6 percent. Spending in the week through Dec. 22 declined 2.2 percent, the fourth week of declines, even after sales increased almost 20 percent over the last weekend before Christmas, Chicago-based ShopperTrak RCT Corp. said yesterday.
``It's not going to overcome the negative forecasts,'' Frederick Crawford, managing director at Southfield, Michigan- based AlixPartners LLP, said of the weekend in a Bloomberg Television interview. ``It's going to be a good start, a very weak midsection, and a strong finish.''
Gasoline at $3 a gallon and rising food prices have discouraged shoppers from spending during November and December, which account for 20 percent of retailers' annual revenue, according to the National Retail Federation in Washington. Target, the second-biggest U.S. discounter, said yesterday that sales at stores open more than a year may decline in December after customer visits slowed in the weeks after Thanksgiving.
Five-Year Low
Sales in November and December this year may rise 4 percent, the slowest growth since 2002, according to the National Retail Federation. ShopperTrak has predicted a 3.6 percent increase. MasterCard's holiday growth figure was the lowest in at least three years.
Costco Wholesale Corp., the largest U.S. chain of wholesale clubs, said the holiday season ``went well,'' the Wall Street Journal reported today. Costco Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti didn't immediately return a call left at his Issaquah, Washington, office today.
Sales rose 19 percent from Dec. 21 to Dec. 23 as U.S. shoppers took advantage of discounts and extended hours, ShopperTrak said.
Less than one-fifth of consumers had finished their holiday shopping as of Dec. 16, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers in New York. J.C. Penney Co., Sears and Toys ``R'' Us Inc. tried to lure late buyers with discounts over the weekend, helping boost U.S. retailers' sales by 7.6 percent on Dec. 22, the Saturday before Christmas.
Chris Lewis, a cleaning-franchise owner, began shopping for his two children on Dec. 21, and may buy more items after Christmas.
Staying Frugal
``I try to stay kind of frugal,'' the 35-year-old resident of Silver Spring, Maryland, said. ``I'm not going to give everything I have in one day.''
Shoppers buying online led the growth in spending, with Internet sales gaining 22 percent from Nov. 23 though Dec. 24, Michael McNamara, vice president for research and analysis at MasterCard Advisors, said in an interview today.
``If you were expecting this holiday season to stimulate a new ramp-up in growth, I think you'd be disappointed,'' McNamara said. said. ``I think the vast majority of people in the marketplace had modest expectations.''
Apparel rose 1.4 percent from a year ago, McNamara said. Men's clothing climbed 2.3 percent, while clothes for women fell 2.4 percent.
Luxury Gains
Luxury goods, excluding jewelry, rose 7.1 percent compared with the same period last year, and footwear sales increased 6 percent.
MasterCard Advisors' SpendingPulse surveys retailers across the U.S. Its figures are based on sales in the MasterCard network and estimates of other forms of payment, including checks and cash. MasterCard is the second-biggest U.S. credit- card company.
Last year's holiday season grew 6.6 percent over 2005's holidays. Two years ago, retail sales grew 8 percent from the previous year, MasterCard said.
Although Target's customer visits increased for the week ended Dec. 22, ``this increase was not sufficient to compensate for the unfavorable traffic trends that carried over into December from the week following Thanksgiving,'' the Minneapolis-based retailer said on a recorded call.

The ecosystem of the mobile phone and iPhone,

To build and develop career www.careerbd.net

---

perfume presents personality www.perfumeplus.zlio.com

---

Just 74 days after launching its iPhone, Apple announced it had already sold 1 million of the things - a milestone that its previous blockbuster product, the iPod, took almost two years to reach.

And yet, to judge by the industry's chatter, the iPhone is already old news. More excitement swirls around rumours that Google, the Web-search giant that is Apple's neighbour in Silicon Valley, could enter the market with its own "gPhone." Google's boss, Eric Schmidt, has already said that the firm plans to bid for a prime slice of the wireless spectrum in a forthcoming auction, something Apple is also said to be considering.

In short, both mobile operators and handset-makers could soon be confronted with two of the world's sexiest brands as direct rivals. Publicly, Apple and Google are being diplomatic.

The industry is a stool with three legs - network service, devices, and the software and content that goes on them - and "I don't think any player in the ecosystem trying to glue it all together will be very successful," says Dipchand Nishar, who leads Google's mobile-phone strategy.

By this he may simply be conceding the obvious, which is that Google would not build hardware, even if it made the other two legs.

But Google seems to be up to something. It bought a company called Android in 2005 that specializes in mobile-phone software. It has Google Talk, a free Internet-calling service. In July it bought GrandCentral Communications, a firm that gives users one single phone number for life. And it recently filed a patent application for a new mobile-payment technology.

It would certainly be tempting to tie all these bits together into a new software "platform" for mobile phones and offer it to handset-makers as an alternative to existing smart-phone operating systems such as Symbian, Palm or Microsoft's Windows Mobile.

Naturally, Google's search, email and document services would be tightly integrated, along with its advertising technologies, which might pave the way for mobile service that is partly or wholly subsidized by advertising.

As a strategy, this might be just different enough from Apple's to assure harmony with its ally.

It would suit neither firm to open hostilities. So Google may concentrate on software for cheaper, mass-market devices, leaving Apple to make elegant, high-end hardware.

Technorati : ecosystem

Trade: U.S. is "World's Biggest Loser"

Manufacturing News today (sorry, not linkable) says that the U.S. is the "world's biggest loser - by far" in terms of the WTO dispute resolution system.

The World Trade Organization has ruled against the United States in 40 of 47 cases... That number is "astounding," according to Robert Lighthizer, a partner in charge the international trade group at the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom. The United States "has suffered disproportionately from the problems with the WTO dispute settlement system, having been named as a defendant in far more cases than any other WTO members."
(Note that Public Citizen's dispute database shows that the United States has lost 43 of 50 cases. Since Manufacturing News doesn't elaborate further on its statistics, we're not sure where the discrepancy arises.) Lighthizer goes on to say,

"As a result of this judicial activism, our trading partners have been able to achieve through litigation what they could never achieve through negotiation... The consequent loss of sovereignty for the United States in its ability to enact and enforce laws for the benefit of the American people has been staggering. The WTO has increasingly seen fit to sit in judgment of sovereign acts running the gamut from U.S. tax policy to environmental measures to public morals."

All this is true, but it's not just the United States that loses at the WTO. Pretty much all defendants lose WTO disputes. According to Public Citizen's WTO disputes database, while the United States has lost 86 percent of its cases as a defendant under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), out of all DSU cases, the defendant loses 88.7 percent of the time. So the United States is roughly in line with the rest of the world in terms of having its domestic laws overridden by the WTO.

So claiming the United States loses at the WTO is accurate, but also misses the bigger picture a bit. As Dani Rodrik says as quoted in my earlier post, what's really needed is to rethink the whole system.

Has the WTO threatened us? - World Trade Organization ruling against US - Column

Well, it happened: the World Trade Organization ruled against an existing law, and people are up in arms. Candidates Dole and Buchanan have suggested that this is on the order of the British navy moving in to restore the crown as sovereign in U.S. affairs.

Here is the quarrel. Brazil and Venezuela, in recent months, attempted to bring into the United States what we might as well call "dirty oil," meaning that it is oil that contains a higher density of pollutants than is permitted by the Clean Air Act. So, we denied that oil access to the American market.

A suit was filed with the WTO by Brazil and Venezuela, which asserted, correctly, that the same quality of oil turned down at our frontier was in fact being pumped, sold, and burned within the United States. This is, plain and simple, discriminatory, and of course the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade exists in order to protest discriminatory practices.

Now the United States has several defenses, none of them conclusive -- they are an attenuation of the violation rather than an excuse for it. It happens that the load of oil being permitted to market notwithstanding its high pollution content was something on the order of an exception. The franchise was given with a view to saving a considerable deposit of oil, on the understanding that the international standard would be invoked beginning in 1998.